Remittance corridor · World Bank RPW · 2025Q3

South Africa → Malawi

Average cost sits in the upper fleet tercile at 38.6% on this South Africa → Malawi route - senders pay more than typical RPW-tracked corridors.

38.6%
Average cost
0.4%
Cheapest · Mukuru
10
Providers tracked

How the 38.6% average cost breaks down

World Bank RPW splits total remittance cost into the provider's transaction fee and the exchange-rate margin applied to the transfer. Same 2025Q3 figures as the detail table below.

Corridor-cost tercile vs fleet

South Africa → Malawi posts 38.6% average cost, above the fleet upper tercile (~6.6%), ranking #343 of 348. Cheapest tracked floor: 0.4% via Mukuru.

#343 of 348
cheapest-cost corpus rank
38.6%
average cost of a $200 transfer
+31.4pp
vs the 7.3% average of 348 corridors
+35.6pp
gap to the UN 3% target

Compared against the 348 corridors in the 2025Q3 release, not a generic headline figure.

F
Corridor Value Score
26/100
South Africa to Malawi

Based on average cost, delivery speed, FX margin, provider competition, and cost trend from World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide data, benchmarked against all 348 tracked corridors - not a quote or a prediction of what you will pay.

Cost F
38.64%
Average total cost, sending $200-equivalent
Speed F
1.1 days
Average delivery time, latest quarter
FX transparency F
24.23%
Exchange-rate margin above the mid-market rate
Competition B+
10 providers
Number of providers actively quoting this corridor
Cost trend B-
-4.71pp
Change in average cost vs. the prior quarter

What changed

World Bank RPW release record: 2025Q1 to 2025Q3

  • Average transfer cost changed from 43.35% to 38.64% (-4.71 percentage points).
  • Lowest observed transfer cost changed from 14.46% to 0.39% (-14.07 percentage points).
  • Providers recorded by the source changed from 13 to 10 (-3 providers).
View saved corridors

Subscribe to this corridor's cost changes (RSS) — one item per World Bank RPW release, no account or email required.

Where this corridor sits by provider panel size

South Africa → Malawi has 10 World Bank RPW providers among 377 tracked corridors (inventory signal, not a cost-quality ranking). Orthogonal to the cost comparison below.

South Africa → Malawi vs all corridors by provider count

Where this corridor's RPW provider panel sits among every tracked route

10 102nd of 377 higher than 275 of 377 corridors

Corridors, banded by RPW provider inventory

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more corridors. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide · 2026-08-10

How South Africa → Malawi compares

Average cost of a $200 transfer, percent, lower is cheaper

South Africa → Malawi38.64%Cheapest provider0.39%348-corridor average (2025Q3)7.25%World Bank global average6.4%UN SDG 10.c target3%

Source: World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW); UN SDG 10.c As of 2025Q3

SDG 10.c progress (target: 3%) 0.0%
Cheapest

38.64% average - 35.6pp above target

Cost trend: South Africa → Malawi

Average and cheapest cost of a $200 transfer over time, percent

0%10%20%30%40%50% 2011Q12013Q42015Q32017Q22019Q12020Q42022Q32024Q22025Q3 38.6%0.39% CheapestAverage

Source: World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) As of 2025Q3

Sending Country

South Africa
Sub-Saharan Africa
16.90%
Avg outbound cost
$1.1B
Total remittances sent
All corridors from South Africa →

Receiving Country

Malawi
Sub-Saharan Africa
38.64%
Avg inbound cost
0
All corridors to Malawi →

Nearby Corridors from South Africa

South Africa is one of the most connected sending markets in our data, with 12 tracked outbound corridors. The 8 below span the widest cost range, from the cheapest to send anywhere from South Africa through to the most expensive.

#DestinationAvg costCheapest
1Mozambique10.3%2.7%
2Kenya10.6%3.4%
3Lesotho11.2%0.0%
4Swaziland11.6%0.0%
5Zimbabwe12.5%5.2%
6Nigeria14.7%3.5%
7Zambia14.7%4.9%
8India16.4%5.3%

World Bank RPW fee spread

Release 2025Q3 ZA→MW

38.6% avg · 0.4% floor · 38.25pp spread on $200

  • AVG 38.6%
  • CHEAP 0.4%
  • SPREAD 38.25pp
  • SDG +35.6pp
  • RANK #343 of 348
  • REL 2025Q3
  • PANEL 10
Tanzania→Rwanda45.1%France→Algeria45.13%Senegal→Mali25.7%South Africa→Malawi (this)38.64%
Cross-sender corridors nearest South Africa → Malawi by average RPW cost (2025Q3)

Fee spread manifest for South Africa → Malawi: entity-varying RPW stamps plus cross-sender ABS(avg_cost) peers from the current release. Compare corridors side-by-side →

High transfer cost on South Africa → Malawi

World Bank RPW prices South Africa → Malawi at 38.64% (2025Q3) - above the fleet upper tercile (~6.6%). Senders here pay more than typical tracked corridors, 32.2 pp above the ~6.4% global average.

That cheapest figure comes from the World Bank's mystery-shopping survey: trained researchers pose as customers and obtain real quotes for a standardized $200 transfer, across the 10 banks, money transfer operators, post offices and mobile-money providers RPW tracks on this corridor. It is a snapshot from that survey quarter, not a live guarantee -- confirm the current rate directly with the provider before sending.

Costs on this route have fallen sharply, down 4.71 percentage points over the tracked period, among the steepest declines in the whole panel as digital-first providers gained share. It sits 35.6 pp above the UN SDG 10.c 3% target.

South Africa → Malawi Long-Track Cost Profile

This is a high-depth World Bank RPW corridor (54 quarterly average-cost readings) - enough history to measure how concentrated the cost path has been, not just the latest quarter. Peak average cost on record was 43.3% in 2025Q1; the trough was 8.5% in 2015Q3. That 34.85pp peak-to-trough span is the multi-year envelope thin-history corridors cannot show.

Across the full 54-quarter panel, 0 readings (0.0% share) landed at or under the UN SDG 3% target. Population standard deviation of the average-cost series is 5.564pp - a wide swing band that rewards checking the current quarter. From 2024Q2 to 2025Q3, the average cost rose 18.62pp (20.0% → 38.6%).

Among the 12 outbound corridors tracked from South Africa, 12 currently post a lower average cost than this route and 0 post a higher one (this corridor sits at 38.6%). That peer-rank read is only honest once the sender book is deep enough - sparse zero-history routes skip it because sibling counts alone do not make a long RPW track record.

About South Africa → Malawi data

PlainRemit compares international money-transfer costs across tracked corridors so you can see which routes and providers charge the least before you send money abroad. This corridor's figures are computed directly from the World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) quarterly survey, a mystery-shopping panel of actual transfer quotes for a standardized $200 transfer.

Average 38.64%; cheapest observed 0.39% via Mukuru; 10 providers tracked across 54 RPW quarters; vintage 2026-08-10.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to send money from South Africa to Malawi?

Average 38.64% of the transfer amount (World Bank RPW, 2025Q3) - upper fleet tercile (above ~6.6%). Cheapest observed: 0.39% via Mukuru.

What is the cheapest way to send money from South Africa to Malawi?

Lowest RPW survey quote: 0.39% (Mukuru). Panel is high-tercile with 10 providers tracked.

Is the South Africa to Malawi corridor meeting the UN SDG cost target?

Not yet: 38.6% is 35.6pp above the UN SDG 10.c 3% target and in the upper fleet cost tercile.

Where does South Africa → Malawi sit among tracked remittance corridors?

According to World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide average cost among 348 tracked corridors on PlainRemit, South Africa → Malawi ranks #343 of 348 (cheapest = #1). Ordinal uses latest_avg_cost ASC matching /rankings/cheapest. See /methodology#corpus-placement.

Source: World Bank, Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) Database (2011-2025). See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: PlainRemit is for general informational purposes only, not financial, tax, or investment advice. PlainRemit is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by the World Bank.