Ranking · World Bank RPW · 2025Q3

Cheapest remittance corridors

The lowest-cost ways to send money across borders, ranked by average price on a $200 transfer, benchmarked against the UN's 3% target.

0.3%
Cheapest · Malaysia→Myanmar
35
Meet UN 3% target
100
Corridors ranked

The verdict

The cheapest corridor on record is Malaysia → Myanmar at just 0.3% - and 35 of the corridors we track already beat the UN's 3% target, proving low-cost transfers are achievable wherever digital competition exists.

E-remit
leading low-cost provider
3.2%
average cost across this top-100
7.9
avg. providers surveyed per corridor

According to the World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide database, these rankings draw on 17,184 quarterly corridor price observations spanning 2011Q1 to 2025Q3, each measured as the cost of sending $200 along a specific country-to-country route. The World Bank panel is irregular (semi-annual in the early 2010s, and no 2025Q2 release), so this is a count of observations, not of consecutive quarters.

MAL→MYA0.29%BEL→ALG1.29%BAH→PAK1.39%UNI→IND1.91%AUS→PAK2%UNI→NIG2.03%KUW→PAK2.05%BAH→IND2.17%
Top 8 cheapest corridors (avg cost %)
E-remit0.05%TransferGo1.09%Bahrain Financing Company0.47%State Bank of India0.15%Remitly0.77%Sendwave0.01%Bahrain Exchange Company1.42%Western Union0.24%
Cheapest provider per corridor (lowest quote %)
#CorridorAvg costCheapestCheapest provider
1Malaysia → Myanmar✓ meets UN 3% target0.3%0.1%E-remit
2Belgium → Algeria✓ meets UN 3% target1.3%1.1%TransferGo
3Bahrain → Pakistan✓ meets UN 3% target1.4%0.5%Bahrain Financing Company
4United Kingdom → India✓ meets UN 3% target1.9%0.1%State Bank of India
5Australia → Pakistan✓ meets UN 3% target2.0%0.8%Remitly
6United Kingdom → Nigeria✓ meets UN 3% target2.0%0.0%Sendwave
7Kuwait → Pakistan✓ meets UN 3% target2.0%1.4%Bahrain Exchange Company
8Bahrain → India✓ meets UN 3% target2.2%0.2%Western Union
9Jordan → Egypt✓ meets UN 3% target2.3%1.3%Musharbash Exchange
10Qatar → Sri Lanka✓ meets UN 3% target2.3%0.7%Doha Bank
11Kuwait → India✓ meets UN 3% target2.4%1.6%Lulu Money
12France → Senegal✓ meets UN 3% target2.4%0.9%Western Union
13Germany → Serbia✓ meets UN 3% target2.5%0.0%Postbank
14Qatar → India✓ meets UN 3% target2.5%1.3%Western Union
15Qatar → Philippines✓ meets UN 3% target2.5%0.8%Western Union
16Australia → Philippines✓ meets UN 3% target2.6%0.5%iRemit
17United Kingdom → Poland✓ meets UN 3% target2.7%0.2%Tonio
18United Kingdom → Pakistan✓ meets UN 3% target2.7%0.5%UBL
19Saudi Arabia → Yemen✓ meets UN 3% target2.7%2.3%MoneyGram
20United Arab Emirates → Sri Lanka✓ meets UN 3% target2.7%0.3%DirectRemit (NBD)
21Malaysia → Nepal✓ meets UN 3% target2.8%1.9%Ria
22Austria → Croatia✓ meets UN 3% target2.8%0.0%TransferGo
23Oman → Jordan✓ meets UN 3% target2.8%2.7%MoneyGram
24Netherlands → Nigeria✓ meets UN 3% target2.8%0.3%WorldRemit
25Spain → Nigeria✓ meets UN 3% target2.9%0.7%WorldRemit
26France → Mali✓ meets UN 3% target2.9%1.2%Taptap Send
27United Kingdom → Nepal✓ meets UN 3% target2.9%0.8%Ace Money Transfer
28Spain → Philippines✓ meets UN 3% target2.9%1.3%MoneyGram
29United States → Nigeria✓ meets UN 3% target2.9%0.0%MoneyGram
30United Arab Emirates → Pakistan✓ meets UN 3% target2.9%0.1%GCC Exchange
31Singapore → India✓ meets UN 3% target2.9%0.5%State Bank of India
32Qatar → Pakistan✓ meets UN 3% target2.9%1.1%UBL Tezraftaar Cash
33Kuwait → Philippines✓ meets UN 3% target2.9%2.2%Western Union
34Germany → Nigeria✓ meets UN 3% target2.9%0.3%Sendwave
35Germany → Tajikistan✓ meets UN 3% target3.0%0.0%TransferGo
36Oman → Pakistan3.0%0.9%Ezremit
37United Arab Emirates → Philippines3.0%0.8%DirectRemit (NBD)
38United Kingdom → Sri Lanka3.1%1.1%Remitly
39France → Cameroon3.1%1.3%Remitly
40Oman → Nepal3.1%2.1%MoneyGram
41Norway → Pakistan3.1%0.7%Western Union
42United Kingdom → Romania3.1%0.9%Remitly
43India → Nepal3.1%0.5%Punjab National Bank
44Germany → Croatia3.1%0.0%Deutsche Bank
45Canada → Nigeria3.2%1.0%Remitly
46Belgium → Congo, Rep.3.2%1.4%MoneyGram
47Singapore → Philippines3.2%0.8%InstaReM
48Germany → Romania3.2%0.0%Deutsche Bank
49Singapore → Indonesia3.2%0.6%InstaReM
50Bahrain → Egypt3.3%2.4%Ezremit
51Saudi Arabia → Sri Lanka3.3%3.0%Fawri
52Singapore → Pakistan3.3%1.3%Wise
53Australia → Indonesia3.3%0.7%InstaReM
54Oman → India3.3%2.4%Bank Muscat
55Australia → China3.3%0.1%InstaReM
56Oman → Sri Lanka3.3%3.1%Mustafa Sultan Exchange Co
57United Kingdom → Philippines3.3%0.4%MoneyGram
58Kuwait → Egypt3.3%2.8%Al Mulla Exchange
59Malaysia → India3.3%1.2%Western Union
60France → Togo3.4%2.5%La Banque Postale via Western Union
61United Arab Emirates → Nepal3.4%0.9%GCC Exchange
62United Kingdom → Kenya3.4%0.4%Sendwave
63United Arab Emirates → South Sudan3.4%2.7%Western Union
64Germany → Togo3.5%1.4%MoneyGram
65Germany → Ukraine3.5%0.0%MoneyGram
66United States → El Salvador3.5%1.0%MoneyGram
67New Zealand → China3.5%1.0%Orbit Remit
68Saudi Arabia → Indonesia3.5%2.9%Fawri
69Portugal → Cape Verde3.5%3.2%Ria
70Jordan → West Bank and Gaza3.5%1.4%Musharbash Exchange
71Canada → Philippines3.6%0.6%Xoom
72Germany → Bulgaria3.6%0.0%Postbank
73Australia → Somalia3.6%1.6%Dahabshiil
74Spain → Peru3.6%1.7%MoneyGram
75Australia → Malaysia3.6%0.8%InstaReM
76United Arab Emirates → Egypt3.7%0.5%DirectRemit (NBD)
77Japan → Vietnam3.7%2.2%JRF
78United Arab Emirates → India3.7%0.8%Emirates NBD
79Poland → Ukraine3.7%0.1%TransferGo
80United States → India3.8%0.4%Placid Express
81France → Comoros3.8%2.8%Western Union
82United States → Pakistan3.8%0.5%Ria
83Switzerland → Hungary3.8%0.6%Western Union
84Malaysia → Vietnam3.8%2.1%MoneyGram
85Saudi Arabia → Philippines3.8%2.6%STC Pay
86Germany → Vietnam3.8%1.3%Skrill
87United Kingdom → Brazil3.9%0.8%Post Office UK via Western Union
88Belgium → Morocco3.9%1.2%MoneyGram
89Qatar → Jordan3.9%2.5%Western Union
90Kuwait → Jordan3.9%2.7%Al Mulla Exchange
91Singapore → Sri Lanka3.9%0.9%InstaReM
92Malaysia → Philippines3.9%1.3%WorldRemit
93United States → Yemen3.9%2.0%MoneyGram
94United States → Ecuador3.9%0.0%Walmart2World
95Austria → Turkey3.9%0.5%TransferGo
96United Kingdom → Vietnam3.9%0.7%Remitly
97United States → Honduras4.0%1.5%Intermex
98Qatar → Nepal4.0%3.1%City Exchange Company
99Germany → Turkey4.0%1.7%Ria
100Australia → Sri Lanka4.0%1.0%InstaReM

What "cheapest" actually means

The ranking above is sorted by the average corridor cost, the mean of every quote captured by the World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide panel for that sender-receiver pair in the 2025Q3 release. The table ranks only the corridors surveyed in that release - a corridor whose last observation is older (some Australia/New Zealand-Pacific pairs stopped being surveyed in 2011, and the Russia-CIS pairs in 2021) keeps its own page and its own "as of" date, but is not ranked here, because a cost from a different year is not comparable to one from this release. Average cost is a better signal than the single-cheapest-provider quote because it captures what a typical sender is likely to pay: the cheapest provider may be a niche fintech, an Android-only app, or a service unavailable in the sender's payout city. The average reflects the marketplace as a whole.

Several patterns repeat across the cheapest-corridor table. Digital-first fintechs (Wise, Remitly, Sendwave, WorldRemit) dominate the lowest-cost routes. High-volume corridors with mature competition, Singapore-India, UK-India, US-Philippines, US-Mexico, consistently sit in the bottom quartile of cost. Corridors with strong mobile-money rails on the receiving side (Kenya M-Pesa, Bangladesh bKash) achieve low costs even without an established cash-pickup network because last-mile payout is cheap.

By contrast, corridors near or above the UN SDG 10.c target of 3% almost always share one or more friction factors: low corridor volume, currency illiquidity, cash-out-only payout (no mobile wallet), correspondent-banking dependency, or thin provider competition. Where these frictions overlap, a typical pattern in intra-African corridors and small-island Pacific routes, the average cost can exceed 8%. The cheapest table here shows what's possible when those frictions are absent.

Sender takeaway: when your corridor appears near the top of this ranking, the marginal value of "shopping around" is small, the market is competitive and most providers cluster near the average. When your corridor is far from this table, switching from a high-cost incumbent (typically a bank or money-transfer-operator branch) to a digital-first fintech can save 4–8 percentage points on a USD 200 transfer, or 8–16 dollars per transaction.

Download the corridor cost extract cited on this page: remittance-corridor-costs.csv (World Bank RPW · CC0).

About this ranking

This ranking sorts every corridor surveyed in the 2025Q3 World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) release by average cost, the mean of every quote captured for that sender-receiver pair, expressed as a percentage of a standardized $200 transfer.

100 corridors are ranked here. The UN SDG 10.c target is a cost of 3% or less by 2030; the World Bank's own reported global average sits around 6.4%.

Source: World Bank, Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) Database, 2025Q3. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainRemit is rendered directly from World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.