Remittance corridor · World Bank RPW · 2025Q3

United Kingdom → Pakistan

Average cost sits in the lower fleet tercile at 2.7% on this United Kingdom → Pakistan route - cheaper than most RPW peers.

2.7%
Average cost
0.5%
Cheapest · UBL
8
Providers tracked

How the 2.7% average cost breaks down

World Bank RPW splits total remittance cost into the provider's transaction fee and the exchange-rate margin applied to the transfer. Same 2025Q3 figures as the detail table below.

Corridor-cost tercile vs fleet

United Kingdom → Pakistan posts 2.7% average cost, below the fleet lower tercile (~4.3%), ranking #18 of 348. Cheapest tracked floor: 0.5% via UBL.

#18 of 348
cheapest-cost corpus rank
2.7%
average cost of a $200 transfer
-4.6pp
vs the 7.3% average of 348 corridors
Met
gap to the UN 3% target

Compared against the 348 corridors in the 2025Q3 release, not a generic headline figure.

B-
Corridor Value Score
67/100
United Kingdom to Pakistan

Based on average cost, delivery speed, FX margin, provider competition, and cost trend from World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide data, benchmarked against all 348 tracked corridors - not a quote or a prediction of what you will pay.

Cost A+
2.67%
Average total cost, sending $200-equivalent
Speed B+
Same day
Average delivery time, latest quarter
FX transparency B-
1.09%
Exchange-rate margin above the mid-market rate
Competition C
8 providers
Number of providers actively quoting this corridor
Cost trend F
+0.96pp
Change in average cost vs. the prior quarter

What changed

World Bank RPW release record: 2025Q1 to 2025Q3

  • Average transfer cost changed from 1.72% to 2.67% (+0.96 percentage points).
  • Lowest observed transfer cost changed from 0.08% to 0.46% (+0.38 percentage points).
  • Providers recorded by the source changed from 7 to 8 (+1 provider).
View saved corridors

Subscribe to this corridor's cost changes (RSS) — one item per World Bank RPW release, no account or email required.

Where this corridor sits by provider panel size

United Kingdom → Pakistan has 8 World Bank RPW providers among 377 tracked corridors (inventory signal, not a cost-quality ranking). Orthogonal to the cost comparison below.

United Kingdom → Pakistan vs all corridors by provider count

Where this corridor's RPW provider panel sits among every tracked route

8 173rd of 377 higher than 204 of 377 corridors

Corridors, banded by RPW provider inventory

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more corridors. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide · 2026-08-10

How United Kingdom → Pakistan compares

Average cost of a $200 transfer, percent, lower is cheaper

United Kingdom → Pakistan2.67%Cheapest provider0.46%348-corridor average (2025Q3)7.25%World Bank global average6.4%UN SDG 10.c target3%

Source: World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW); UN SDG 10.c As of 2025Q3

SDG 10.c progress (target: 3%) 100.0%
Cheapest

2.67% average - target met

Cost trend: United Kingdom → Pakistan

Average and cheapest cost of a $200 transfer over time, percent

0%2%4%6% 2011Q12013Q42015Q32017Q22019Q12020Q42022Q32024Q22025Q3 2.67%0.46% CheapestAverage

Source: World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) As of 2025Q3

Sending Country

United Kingdom
Europe & Central Asia
5.08%
Avg outbound cost
$13.2B
Total remittances sent
All corridors from United Kingdom →

Receiving Country

Pakistan
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
3.36%
Avg inbound cost
$40.5B
Total remittances received
All corridors to Pakistan →

Nearby Corridors from United Kingdom

United Kingdom is one of the most connected sending markets in our data, with 32 tracked outbound corridors. The 8 below span the widest cost range, from the cheapest to send anywhere from United Kingdom through to the most expensive.

#DestinationAvg costCheapest
1India1.9%0.1%
2Nigeria2.0%0.0%
3Poland2.7%0.2%
4Nepal2.9%0.8%
5Sri Lanka3.1%1.1%
6Romania3.1%0.9%
7Philippines3.3%0.4%
8Kenya3.4%0.4%

World Bank RPW fee spread

Release 2025Q3 GB→PK

2.7% avg · 0.5% floor · 2.21pp spread on $200

  • AVG 2.7%
  • CHEAP 0.5%
  • SPREAD 2.21pp
  • SDG MET
  • RANK #18 of 348
  • REL 2025Q3
  • PANEL 8
Saudi Arabia→Yemen2.69%United Arab Emirates→Sri LankaUnited Arab Emirates→Sri Lan…2.7%Australia→Philippines2.61%United Kingdom→Pakistan (this)United Kingdom→Pakistan (thi…2.67%
Cross-sender corridors nearest United Kingdom → Pakistan by average RPW cost (2025Q3)

Fee spread manifest for United Kingdom → Pakistan: entity-varying RPW stamps plus cross-sender ABS(avg_cost) peers from the current release. Compare corridors side-by-side →

Low transfer cost on United Kingdom → Pakistan

World Bank RPW prices United Kingdom → Pakistan at 2.67% (2025Q3) - below the fleet lower tercile (~4.3%). That places this route among cheaper corridors on the panel, 3.7 pp under the ~6.4% global average.

That cheapest figure comes from the World Bank's mystery-shopping survey: trained researchers pose as customers and obtain real quotes for a standardized $200 transfer, across the 8 banks, money transfer operators, post offices and mobile-money providers RPW tracks on this corridor. It is a snapshot from that survey quarter, not a live guarantee -- confirm the current rate directly with the provider before sending.

Costs here have crept up 0.96 percentage points over the tracked period, bucking the wider trend toward cheaper transfers seen on most corridors. It currently meets the UN SDG 10.c 3% target.

United Kingdom → Pakistan Long-Track Cost Profile

This is a high-depth World Bank RPW corridor (54 quarterly average-cost readings) - enough history to measure how concentrated the cost path has been, not just the latest quarter. Peak average cost on record was 5.1% in 2020Q1; the trough was 1.7% in 2025Q1. That 3.40pp peak-to-trough span is the multi-year envelope thin-history corridors cannot show.

Across the full 54-quarter panel, 18 readings (33.3% share) landed at or under the UN SDG 3% target. Population standard deviation of the average-cost series is 0.795pp - a moderate swing band. From 2024Q2 to 2025Q3, the average cost rose 0.79pp (1.9% → 2.7%).

Among the 32 outbound corridors tracked from United Kingdom, 3 currently post a lower average cost than this route and 29 post a higher one (this corridor sits at 2.7%). That peer-rank read is only honest once the sender book is deep enough - sparse zero-history routes skip it because sibling counts alone do not make a long RPW track record.

About United Kingdom → Pakistan data

PlainRemit compares international money-transfer costs across tracked corridors so you can see which routes and providers charge the least before you send money abroad. This corridor's figures are computed directly from the World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) quarterly survey, a mystery-shopping panel of actual transfer quotes for a standardized $200 transfer.

Average 2.67%; cheapest observed 0.46% via UBL; 8 providers tracked across 54 RPW quarters; vintage 2026-08-10.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to send money from United Kingdom to Pakistan?

Average 2.67% of the transfer amount (World Bank RPW, 2025Q3) - lower fleet tercile (below ~4.3%). Cheapest observed: 0.46% via UBL.

What is the cheapest way to send money from United Kingdom to Pakistan?

Lowest RPW survey quote on this corridor: 0.46% (UBL). 8 providers tracked.

Is the United Kingdom to Pakistan corridor meeting the UN SDG cost target?

Yes: 2.7% is at or under the UN SDG 10.c 3% target and sits in the lower fleet cost tercile.

Where does United Kingdom → Pakistan sit among tracked remittance corridors?

According to World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide average cost among 348 tracked corridors on PlainRemit, United Kingdom → Pakistan ranks #18 of 348 (cheapest = #1). Ordinal uses latest_avg_cost ASC matching /rankings/cheapest. See /methodology#corpus-placement.

Source: World Bank, Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) Database (2011-2025). See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: PlainRemit is for general informational purposes only, not financial, tax, or investment advice. PlainRemit is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by the World Bank.