Remittance corridor · World Bank RPW · 2025Q3

Japan → Philippines

Average cost sits in the upper fleet tercile at 12.9% on this Japan → Philippines route - senders pay more than typical RPW-tracked corridors.

12.9%
Average cost
2.1%
Cheapest · Wise
17
Providers tracked

How the 12.9% average cost breaks down

World Bank RPW splits total remittance cost into the provider's transaction fee and the exchange-rate margin applied to the transfer. Same 2025Q3 figures as the detail table below.

Corridor-cost tercile vs fleet

Japan → Philippines posts 12.9% average cost, above the fleet upper tercile (~6.6%), ranking #320 of 348. Cheapest tracked floor: 2.1% via Wise.

#320 of 348
cheapest-cost corpus rank
12.9%
average cost of a $200 transfer
+5.6pp
vs the 7.3% average of 348 corridors
+9.9pp
gap to the UN 3% target

Compared against the 348 corridors in the 2025Q3 release, not a generic headline figure.

F
Corridor Value Score
33/100
Japan to Philippines

Based on average cost, delivery speed, FX margin, provider competition, and cost trend from World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide data, benchmarked against all 348 tracked corridors - not a quote or a prediction of what you will pay.

Cost F
12.88%
Average total cost, sending $200-equivalent
Speed F
1.4 days
Average delivery time, latest quarter
FX transparency C+
1.20%
Exchange-rate margin above the mid-market rate
Competition A+
17 providers
Number of providers actively quoting this corridor
Cost trend F
+6.85pp
Change in average cost vs. the prior quarter

What changed

World Bank RPW release record: 2025Q1 to 2025Q3

  • Average transfer cost changed from 6.03% to 12.88% (+6.85 percentage points).
  • Lowest observed transfer cost changed from 2.25% to 2.06% (-0.19 percentage points).
View saved corridors

Subscribe to this corridor's cost changes (RSS) — one item per World Bank RPW release, no account or email required.

Where this corridor sits by provider panel size

Japan → Philippines has 17 World Bank RPW providers among 377 tracked corridors (inventory signal, not a cost-quality ranking). Orthogonal to the cost comparison below.

Japan → Philippines vs all corridors by provider count

Where this corridor's RPW provider panel sits among every tracked route

17 9th of 377 higher than 368 of 377 corridors

Corridors, banded by RPW provider inventory

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more corridors. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide · 2026-08-10

How Japan → Philippines compares

Average cost of a $200 transfer, percent, lower is cheaper

Japan → Philippines12.88%Cheapest provider2.06%348-corridor average (2025Q3)7.25%World Bank global average6.4%UN SDG 10.c target3%

Source: World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW); UN SDG 10.c As of 2025Q3

SDG 10.c progress (target: 3%) 17.6%
Cheapest

12.88% average - 9.9pp above target

Cost trend: Japan → Philippines

Average and cheapest cost of a $200 transfer over time, percent

0%5%10%15% 2011Q12013Q42015Q32017Q22019Q12020Q42022Q32024Q22025Q3 12.9%2.06% CheapestAverage

Source: World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) As of 2025Q3

Sending Country

Japan
East Asia & Pacific
10.69%
Avg outbound cost
$7.2B
Total remittances sent
All corridors from Japan →

Receiving Country

Philippines
East Asia & Pacific
4.13%
Avg inbound cost
$41.6B
Total remittances received
All corridors to Philippines →

Nearby Corridors from Japan

Japan sends through 7 corridors we track. Comparing them against the Japan → Philippines route shows whether this destination is cheap or expensive relative to that country's other outbound options.

#DestinationAvg costCheapest
1Vietnam3.7%2.2%
2Indonesia5.6%2.2%
3Thailand8.3%2.7%
4Brazil8.3%2.4%
5India8.7%1.2%
6China18.5%3.6%
7South Korea19.4%8.0%

World Bank RPW fee spread

Release 2025Q3 JP→PH

12.9% avg · 2.1% floor · 10.82pp spread on $200

  • AVG 12.9%
  • CHEAP 2.1%
  • SPREAD 10.82pp
  • SDG +9.9pp
  • RANK #320 of 348
  • REL 2025Q3
  • PANEL 17
Switzerland→Kosovo12.87%Thailand→Indonesia12.81%Thailand→China12.78%Japan→Philippines (this)12.88%
Cross-sender corridors nearest Japan → Philippines by average RPW cost (2025Q3)

Fee spread manifest for Japan → Philippines: entity-varying RPW stamps plus cross-sender ABS(avg_cost) peers from the current release. Compare corridors side-by-side →

High transfer cost on Japan → Philippines

World Bank RPW prices Japan → Philippines at 12.88% (2025Q3) - above the fleet upper tercile (~6.6%). Senders here pay more than typical tracked corridors, 6.5 pp above the ~6.4% global average.

That cheapest figure comes from the World Bank's mystery-shopping survey: trained researchers pose as customers and obtain real quotes for a standardized $200 transfer, across the 17 banks, money transfer operators, post offices and mobile-money providers RPW tracks on this corridor. It is a snapshot from that survey quarter, not a live guarantee -- confirm the current rate directly with the provider before sending.

Costs on this route have risen sharply, up 6.85 percentage points over the tracked period, a notable outlier since most tracked corridors have moved the other way. It sits 9.9 pp above the UN SDG 10.c 3% target.

Japan → Philippines Long-Track Cost Profile

This is a high-depth World Bank RPW corridor (54 quarterly average-cost readings) - enough history to measure how concentrated the cost path has been, not just the latest quarter. Peak average cost on record was 13.8% in 2011Q1; the trough was 5.9% in 2021Q4. That 7.85pp peak-to-trough span is the multi-year envelope thin-history corridors cannot show.

Across the full 54-quarter panel, 0 readings (0.0% share) landed at or under the UN SDG 3% target. Population standard deviation of the average-cost series is 2.296pp - a wide swing band that rewards checking the current quarter. From 2024Q2 to 2025Q3, the average cost rose 6.25pp (6.6% → 12.9%).

Among the 7 outbound corridors tracked from Japan, 5 currently post a lower average cost than this route and 2 post a higher one (this corridor sits at 12.9%). That peer-rank read is only honest once the sender book is deep enough - sparse zero-history routes skip it because sibling counts alone do not make a long RPW track record.

About Japan → Philippines data

PlainRemit compares international money-transfer costs across tracked corridors so you can see which routes and providers charge the least before you send money abroad. This corridor's figures are computed directly from the World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) quarterly survey, a mystery-shopping panel of actual transfer quotes for a standardized $200 transfer.

Average 12.88%; cheapest observed 2.06% via Wise; 17 providers tracked across 54 RPW quarters; vintage 2026-08-10.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to send money from Japan to Philippines?

Average 12.88% of the transfer amount (World Bank RPW, 2025Q3) - upper fleet tercile (above ~6.6%). Cheapest observed: 2.06% via Wise.

What is the cheapest way to send money from Japan to Philippines?

Lowest RPW survey quote: 2.06% (Wise). Panel is high-tercile with 17 providers tracked.

Is the Japan to Philippines corridor meeting the UN SDG cost target?

Not yet: 12.9% is 9.9pp above the UN SDG 10.c 3% target and in the upper fleet cost tercile.

Where does Japan → Philippines sit among tracked remittance corridors?

According to World Bank Remittance Prices Worldwide average cost among 348 tracked corridors on PlainRemit, Japan → Philippines ranks #320 of 348 (cheapest = #1). Ordinal uses latest_avg_cost ASC matching /rankings/cheapest. See /methodology#corpus-placement.

Source: World Bank, Remittance Prices Worldwide (RPW) Database (2011-2025). See our methodology for details.

Disclaimer: PlainRemit is for general informational purposes only, not financial, tax, or investment advice. PlainRemit is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by the World Bank.